I'm one of those weird people that loves doing research. Which is probably why I went to law school, to read cases. Today I came across something in a case that has been a question I've been wanting to ask for years:
"When defendant was told that he was being released pending further investigation because the substances seized had not yet been analyzed by the crime lab, defendant stated, 'Well, doesn't the crime lab know what weed looks like?'"
State of Minnesota v. Cavegn, 294 N.W.2d 717, 720 (1980).
Exactly.
No comments:
Post a Comment